2010 WPX Survey Results (part 2)

In September, 2010, a survey on the WPX Contest was sent to everyone who had submitted a log in the 2010 WPX RTTY, SSB, and CW contests. Read part 1 first.

Q. Should logs be open to the public?

The CQ WW Contest has led the way for many years in making submitted logs publicly available. We wanted to see if WPX participants would like to have the same opportunity.

The table below shows the results segmented by operating style.

 

Should logs be open to the public?

  Strongly Agree Agree Undecided Disagree Strongly Disagree Row Totals
Serious competitor trying to win a certificate

570

565

125

90

48

1398

40.8%

40.4%

8.9%

6.4%

3.4%

29.6%

Part time operator trying for the highest score possible

444

715

190

103

37

1489

29.8%

48.0%

12.8%

6.9%

2.5%

31.5%

Chasing contacts for WPX or other awards

147

280

75

42

20

564

26.1%

49.6%

13.3%

7.4%

3.5%

11.9%

Having fun and giving points to others

309

538

137

100

35

1119

27.6%

48.1%

12.2%

8.9%

3.1%

23.7%

Other

53

59

25

12

8

157

33.8%

37.6%

15.9%

7.6%

5.1%

3.3%

Column Total

1523

2157

552

347

148

4727

Column Percent

32.2%

45.6%

11.7%

7.3%

3.1%

100%

It is good to see that the results are consistent across all participation types. Between 70 and 80% are in Agree or Strongly Agree. Approximately 10% of the entrants do not want their logs made public.

Based on this level of support, we WILL make logs publicly available on the web site after the results are released. We WILL NOT release any logs that are submitted as CHECKLOG. We will also remove all email and postal addresses from the published logs to address privacy concerns.

Q. Should log checking reports be open to the public?

While making logs public, the CQWW Contest has kept log checking reports hidden behind passwords provided to each entrant. This creates a lot of extra administrative work and we wanted to see if participants would be open to making this information public.

 

Should log checking reports be open to the public?

  Strongly Agree Agree Undecided Disagree Strongly Disagree Row Totals
Serious competitor trying to win a certificate

471

530

174

169

54

1398

33.7%

37.9%

12.4%

12.1%

3.9%

29.6%

Part time operator trying for the highest score possible

389

668

240

156

36

1489

26.1%

44.9%

16.1%

10.5%

2.4%

31.5%

Chasing contacts for WPX or other awards

144

276

79

44

21

564

25.5%

48.9%

14.0%

7.8%

3.7%

11.9%

Having fun and giving points to others

266

544

175

97

37

1119

23.8%

48.6%

15.6%

8.7%

3.3%

23.7%

Other

43

63

26

16

9

157

27.4%

40.1%

16.6%

10.2%

5.7%

3.3%

Column Total

1313

2081

694

482

157

4727

Column Percent

27.8%

44.0%

14.7%

10.2%

3.3%

100%

Once again the results were consistent across all operating styles. The most serious competitors (who typically have the cleanest logs) were most in favor of making the log checking reports public. The casual operators were less in favor.

No decision on publishing log checking reports has been made. We continue to seek input on this topic.

Q. The Club Competition requires all club members to reside or operate from within a 275 km circle (except DXpeditions). Should the 275 km distance limit be changed?

Beginning with 2009, the club category rules for WPX SSB/CW were changed to match those of the CQWW Contest. We received many different suggestions around this topic and wanted to get some feedback from the participants on the issue.

Answer Count Percent
No change 1937 41.44%
Increase to 500 km 499 10.68%
Remove limit 711 15.21%
Don’t care 1335 28.56%
Other 192 4.11%
Total 4674  

46% of the responses from North America were in favor of no change (compared to 26% of Europeans). Those from South America and Asia were in favor of removing the limit completely. A sizable group had no opinion at all. We continue to seek input on this topic before making a final decision.

Q. Have you downloaded a certificate from the cqwpx.com web site?

Answer Count Percent
Yes 1444 30.06%
No 3359 69.94%

The WPX SSB and CW contest results allow any participant to download a certificate in Adobe pdf format. The RTTY contest does not yet have this capability.

We were happy to see that the number of people who had downloaded a certificate increased from 20.5% in 2009 to 30% this year. It was the part time operators trying to for highest score who were most likely to have tried the online certificate feature.

Q. If you won a certificate, would you be willing pay $1 USD to receive the certificate by mail?

The purpose of this question was to measure the value that entrants place on receiving a printed certificate
in the mail.

Answer Count Percent
Yes 2812 58.55%
No 1255 26.13%
Don’t care 736 15.32%

It was very gratifying to see this level of support for paper certificates by mail. We hear you and will do our best to see that this continues. We will explore a method for entrants to opt out of receiving certificates as a way to help lower our costs.

End of part 2. Look for more results in part 3 coming soon…

2010 WPX Survey Results (part 1)

The second annual WPX Contest Survey was conducted between September 6 and 29, 2010. Invitations were sent to 8144 email addresses from logs submitted in the 2010 WPX RTTY, SSB, and CW Contests. No public announcement was made of the survey so that it would be limited only to participants of the contests. In the end, 6358 people started the survey and 4555 were able to complete it. This is an amazing response rate and once again demonstrates the passion contesters have for the WPX Contest.

Let’s begin by learning a little about who responded.

Q: Which phrase best describes your operating style in the CQ WPX Contest?

Answer Count Percent
Serious competitor trying to win a certificate 1544 30.39%
Part time operator trying for the highest score possible 1551 30.53%
Chasing contacts for WPX or other awards 622 12.24%
Having fun and giving points to others 1196 23.54%
Other 167 3.29%

As might be expected, the most serious competitors had the highest motivation to respond to the survey. Even so, the responses indicate we have a wide range of participation levels represented and can feel confident that the individual question results match those of the contest community.

Q: Which modes have you operated the WPX Contest in 2009-2010?

This question allowed more than one answer.

Answer Count Percent
CW 2880 37.82%
SSB 3089 40.56%
RTTY 1646 21.62%
Total 7615  

Q: Which is your favorite mode for contesting?

This question allowed only one answer.

Answer Count Percentage
CW 2337 50.79%
SSB 1523 33.10%
RTTY 741 16.11%
Total 4601  

In the 2009 survey, the results were very similar: CW (51.9%), SSB (35.2%), and RTTY (12.9%).

Now let’s move to the questions about possible rule changes…

Q: Should the Single Operator and Single Operator Assisted categories be combined into one Single Operator category?

(The new category would allow ALL single operator entrants to use spotting networks, DX cluster, packet, reverse beacon, chat, telnet, and DX Skimmer to help the operator find contacts.)

This is a subject of wide debate among contesters. First, let’s look at the results for the 2010 survey broken down by participation style.

  Yes No Don’t care Row Totals
Serious competitor trying to win a certificate 668 714 90 1472
45.38% 48.51% 6.11% 30.04%
Part time operator trying for the highest score possible 617 711 186 1514
40.75% 46.96% 12.29% 30.9%
Chasing contacts for WPX or other awards 254 245 93 592
42.91% 41.39% 15.71% 12.08%
Having fun and giving points to others 429 484 245 1158
37.05% 41.8% 21.16% 23.63%
Other 46 92 26 164
28.05% 56.1% 15.85% 3.35%
Column Total 2014 2246 640 4900
Column Percent 41.1% 45.84% 13.06% 100%

Let’s compare how the responses in 2010 compared to the same question asked in 2009.

Year Yes No Don’t Care
2009 28.7% 51.8% 19.4%
2010 41.1% 45.8% 13.0%

Sentiment is still in favor of keeping the categories separate, but it is getting closer. The WPX RTTY contest only has one single operator category and does not distinguish between SO and SOA. Including the RTTY entrants in the survey may have skewed the results. Another factor is that the high number of multipliers in the WPX Contest provides much less advantage to operators using DX spotting so there is less need to have separate categories.

People were very emotional in their comments on this issue! Many comments were directed at the perception of cheating that goes on in some areas. Others felt that allowing DX spotting made the overall contest more fun. While others wanted to protect the idea of single operator having to make their own score.

Conclusion: We will continue with the separate SO and SOA categories in WPX SSB/CW for 2011.

End of part 1. Look for more results in part 2 coming soon…

Survey Results – What is our Favorite Mode?

Time to get back to reporting the results of the on-line WPX participant survey held last August-September. Doug, KR2Q, volunteered to help do some data mining on the results. He discovered a suprising trend among the results.

Favorite Mode

When asked for their favorite contesting mode, the results are simple.

CW – 52%
SSB – 35%
RTTY – 13%

Favorite Mode vs Years of Experience

The survey also asked respondents to enter the number of years they had been active in contests. 

  Mode preference vs Years of Experience

I had always assumed there were Phone ops and CW ops and some who liked both.  I never expected such a correlation between years of experience and changing preference.  What does this say for the future of contesting?  For the future of SSB contesting?!

Global Survey

There were 5037 responses in the graph above. The chart below breaks them down by continent.Survey responses by continent

These results seem to echo what we see on the air and in the log submissions. Europe is the most active part of the world for WPX contesting.